Keep 100% of your partners updated and enabled
Experience how Kiflo can scale your partner program.
Book Your DemoStop the Reset Cycle: From Stalling to Focused Partner Programs That Deliver
Partner programs don’t stall because partnerships fail; they stall when built like direct sales. In this guide, Sonya Jamula shares how to reset expectations, focus on the right partners, and build programs that compound revenue over time.
3
Phases Of a Sane Partner Timeline
5–10
Lighthouse Partners Instead of 20 “Strategic” Bets
12–18
Months To Meaningful Partner ARR
Stop the Reset Cycle: From Stalling to Focused Partner Programs That Deliver
Why direct-sales thinking breaks partnerships
A realistic timeline for partner performance
How to pick lighthouse partners without guessing
Leading indicators to track before revenue appears
What “enough” resourcing actually looks like
How leadership can stop priority whiplash
How to build win-win-win partner motions
Download Now
No email is needed.
We like to keep things simple!
We like to keep things simple!
What You'll Discover Inside
Practical frameworks and actionable insights to transform your partnership strategy
Why Partner Programs Stall
Most leadership teams apply direct-sales assumptions to indirect motions—expecting partners to behave like off-payroll AEs. This mismatch creates missed targets, broken trust, and repeated resets.
The Direct vs. Indirect Reality Check
Partners require design, enablement, and patience across two organizations. Treating partnerships like headcount additions guarantees disappointment.
A Sane Timeline for Partner Performance
The guide outlines a realistic progression: 0–90 days (Design & first joint win), 90–180 days (Signals and repeatable patterns), (6–12 months) Forecastable pipeline
What Leadership Must Do Differently
From setting clear mandates to forecasting off leading indicators, leadership behavior determines whether partnerships compound or constantly reset.
How to Pick Lighthouse Partners Without Guessing
Instead of spreading effort thin, the guide shows how to identify 5–10 partners tightly aligned to your ICP and overinvest to prove a repeatable motion.
Leading vs. Lagging Indicators
Revenue is a lagging indicator. The guide explains which leading signals, activation, enabled reps, joint opportunities, predict future success.
What Under-Resourcing Actually Looks Like
One partner manager, no enablement, misaligned comp plans—this section breaks down why “partnerships don’t work” is often a resourcing problem.
How to Get Incentives Right
If partner deals create friction for sales, sales will avoid them. Clean routing, equal economics, and easy CRM tagging change behavior fast.
The Partnership Challenge
Practical frameworks and actionable insights to transform your partnership strategy
The Problem
Common Partnership Failures
Unrealistic timelines borrowed from direct sales
Too many partners and no clear focus
Forecasting revenue before signals exist
Chronic under-resourcing
Incentives that punish partner deals
Leadership resetting strategy every quarter
The Solution
What Actually Works
Design one clear motion per partner type
Focus on lighthouse partners aligned to your ICP
Track leading indicators before ARR
Resource partnerships with baseline enablement and support
Align incentives so sales pulls partners into deals
Set leadership mandates that protect focus
Discover How to Create Focused Partner Programs
and finally stop resetting your cycles.
1
Direct Sales Logic Breaks Indirect Motions
Partners aren’t controllable headcount and shouldn’t be treated like it.
2
Focus Beats Volume
A small set of lighthouse partners delivers more learning and revenue than dozens of shallow relationships.
3
Leading Indicators Predict Revenue
Activation, enablement, and joint activity matter long before ARR shows up.
4
Under-Resourcing Is Invisible—Until It Fails
Enablement, PMM, and sales engineering aren’t “nice to haves.”
5
Leadership Behavior Determines Success
Mandate, focus, alignment, and protection from whiplash are non-negotiable.
